↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Suicidality in sleep disorders: prevalence, impact, and management strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Nature and science of sleep, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
32 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Suicidality in sleep disorders: prevalence, impact, and management strategies
Published in
Nature and science of sleep, September 2017
DOI 10.2147/nss.s125597
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher W Drapeau, Michael R Nadorff

Abstract

Sleep disturbances are associated with suicide-related thoughts and behaviors, and the incidence of sleep concerns and suicide has increased recently in the US. Most published research exploring the sleep-suicidality relation is focused on select sleep disorders, with few reviews offering a comprehensive overview of the sleep-suicidality literature. This narrative review broadly investigates the growing research literature on sleep disorders and suicidality, noting the prevalence of suicide ideation and nonfatal and fatal suicide attempts, the impact of several sleep disorders on suicide risk, and potential sleep-disorder management strategies for mitigating suicide risk. Aside from insomnia symptoms and nightmares, there exist opportunities to learn more about suicide risk across many sleep conditions, including whether sleep disorders are associated with suicide risk independently of other psychiatric conditions or symptoms. Generally, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials examining the modification of suicide risk via evidence-based sleep interventions for individuals with sleep disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 16%
Student > Master 10 11%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 32 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 23 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 14%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 37 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,498,696
of 26,289,377 outputs
Outputs from Nature and science of sleep
#90
of 646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,314
of 329,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature and science of sleep
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,289,377 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,669 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them