↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Hearing disability in patients with Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy: unrecognized co-pathology?

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Hearing disability in patients with Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy: unrecognized co-pathology?
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2011
DOI 10.2147/opth.s23091
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marilette Stehouwer, Allegonda Van der lelij, Bijlsma

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2017.
All research outputs
#10,433,209
of 11,768,109 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,258
of 1,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,557
of 241,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#19
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,768,109 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,471 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.