↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Gabapentin enacarbil – clinical efficacy in restless legs syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Gabapentin enacarbil – clinical efficacy in restless legs syndrome
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, April 2010
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s5712
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pinky Agarwal, Alida Griffith, Henry R Costantino, Narendra Vaish

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 5%
Germany 1 5%
Unknown 17 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 16%
Professor 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Researcher 2 11%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 3 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Chemistry 2 11%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,151
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,293
of 103,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.