↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Treating glioblastoma multiforme with selective high-dose liposomal doxorubicin chemotherapy induced by repeated focused ultrasound

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Treating glioblastoma multiforme with selective high-dose liposomal doxorubicin chemotherapy induced by repeated focused ultrasound
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2012
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s29229
Pubmed ID
Authors

Feng-Yi Yang, Ming-Che Teng, Maggie Lu, Hsiang-Fa Liang, Yan-Ru Lee, Chueh-Chuan Yen, Muh-Lii Liang, Tai-Tong Wong

Abstract

High-dose tissue-specific delivery of therapeutic agents would be a valuable clinical strategy. We have previously shown that repeated transcranial focused ultrasound is able to increase the delivery of Evans blue significantly into brain tissue. The present study shows that repeated pulsed high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) can be used to deliver high-dose atherosclerotic plaque-specific peptide-1 (AP-1)-conjugated liposomes selectively to brain tumors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 93 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 22%
Researcher 21 22%
Other 6 6%
Student > Master 6 6%
Professor 5 5%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 25 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 21%
Chemistry 9 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 8%
Engineering 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Other 17 18%
Unknown 30 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,355,485
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#814
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,308
of 253,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#26
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.