↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Treating glioblastoma multiforme with selective high-dose liposomal doxorubicin chemotherapy induced by repeated focused ultrasound

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Treating glioblastoma multiforme with selective high-dose liposomal doxorubicin chemotherapy induced by repeated focused ultrasound
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2012
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s29229
Pubmed ID
Authors

Feng-Yi Yang, Ming-Che Teng, Maggie Lu, Hsiang-Fa Liang, Yan-Ru Lee, Chueh-Chuan Yen, Muh-Lii Liang, Tai-Tong Wong

Abstract

High-dose tissue-specific delivery of therapeutic agents would be a valuable clinical strategy. We have previously shown that repeated transcranial focused ultrasound is able to increase the delivery of Evans blue significantly into brain tissue. The present study shows that repeated pulsed high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) can be used to deliver high-dose atherosclerotic plaque-specific peptide-1 (AP-1)-conjugated liposomes selectively to brain tumors.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 25%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 14%
Chemistry 7 12%
Engineering 7 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Other 16 27%
Unknown 1 2%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2015.
All research outputs
#2,559,218
of 10,999,894 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#176
of 2,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,224
of 192,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,999,894 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,164 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.