↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Carbon nanotube-incorporated collagen hydrogels improve cell alignment and the performance of cardiac constructs

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Carbon nanotube-incorporated collagen hydrogels improve cell alignment and the performance of cardiac constructs
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, April 2017
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s128030
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongyu Sun, Jing Zhou, Zhu Huang, Linlin Qu, Ning Lin, Chengxiao Liang, Ruiwu Dai, Lijun Tang, Fuzhou Tian

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) provide an essential 2-D microenvironment for cardiomyocyte growth and function. However, it remains to be elucidated whether CNT nanostructures can promote cell-cell integrity and facilitate the formation of functional tissues in 3-D hydrogels. Here, single-walled CNTs were incorporated into collagen hydrogels to fabricate (CNT/Col) hydrogels, which improved mechanical and electrical properties. The incorporation of CNTs (up to 1 wt%) exhibited no toxicity to cardiomyocytes and enhanced cell adhesion and elongation. Through the use of immunohistochemical staining, transmission electron microscopy, and intracellular calcium-transient measurement, the incorporation of CNTs was found to improve cell alignment and assembly remarkably, which led to the formation of engineered cardiac tissues with stronger contraction potential. Importantly, cardiac tissues based on CNT/Col hydrogels were noted to have better functionality. Collectively, the incorporation of CNTs into the Col hydrogels improved cell alignment and the performance of cardiac constructs. Our study suggests that CNT/Col hydrogels offer a promising tissue scaffold for cardiac constructs, and might serve as injectable biomaterials to deliver cell or drug molecules for cardiac regeneration following myocardial infarction in the near future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Researcher 13 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 33 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 15 14%
Materials Science 13 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Chemistry 8 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Other 24 22%
Unknown 34 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2017.
All research outputs
#19,981,237
of 24,554,073 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#3,030
of 4,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,002
of 314,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#63
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,554,073 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,006 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.