Title |
The association of age of toilet training and dysfunctional voiding
|
---|---|
Published in |
Research and Reports in Urology, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.2147/rru.s66839 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Steve J Hodges, Kyle A Richards, Ilya Gorbachinsky, L Spencer Krane |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
Researcher | 8 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 9% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 18 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 14% |
Psychology | 5 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 22 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 49. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2024.
All research outputs
#849,085
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from Research and Reports in Urology
#7
of 249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,906
of 260,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research and Reports in Urology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them