↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Acceleration training for managing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Acceleration training for managing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a pilot study
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, November 2014
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s68322
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sechang Oh, Takashi Shida, Akemi Sawai, Tsuyoshi Maruyama, Kiyoshi Eguchi, Tomonori Isobe, Yoshikazu Okamoto, Noriko Someya, Kiyoji Tanaka, Emi Arai, Akiko Tozawa, Junichi Shoda

Abstract

While aerobic training is generally recommended as therapeutic exercise in guidelines, the effectiveness of resistance training has recently been reported in the management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Acceleration training (AT) is a new training method that provides a physical stimulation effect on skeletal muscles by increasing gravitational acceleration with vibration. AT has recently been indicated as a component of medicine. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of AT in the management of NAFLD in obese subjects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 23 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 19%
Sports and Recreations 10 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 25 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2015.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1,070
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,456
of 273,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#11
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.