↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Acceleration training for managing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Acceleration training for managing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a pilot study
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, November 2014
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s68322
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sechang Oh, Takashi Shida, Akemi Sawai, Tsuyoshi Maruyama, Tomonori Isobe, Yoshikazu Okamoto, Noriko Someya, Kiyoji Tanaka, Emi Arai, Akiko Tozawa, Junichi Shoda, Eguchi Kiyoshi

Abstract

While aerobic training is generally recommended as therapeutic exercise in guidelines, the effectiveness of resistance training has recently been reported in the management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Acceleration training (AT) is a new training method that provides a physical stimulation effect on skeletal muscles by increasing gravitational acceleration with vibration. AT has recently been indicated as a component of medicine. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of AT in the management of NAFLD in obese subjects.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 3%
Unknown 36 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Master 6 16%
Unspecified 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Other 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 30%
Unspecified 6 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Sports and Recreations 4 11%
Other 7 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2015.
All research outputs
#9,993,257
of 12,485,238 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#763
of 922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,637
of 283,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,485,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 922 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.