↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The effect of errorless learning on quality of life in patients with Korsakoff’s syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
The effect of errorless learning on quality of life in patients with Korsakoff’s syndrome
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, November 2017
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s140950
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yvonne CM Rensen, Jos IM Egger, Josette Westhoff, Serge JW Walvoort, Roy PC Kessels

Abstract

Errorless learning (EL) is a promising rehabilitation principle for (re)learning instrumental activities in patients with amnesia, including patients with Korsakoff's syndrome (KS). Successfully (re)learning tasks might improve the sense of competence and independence, and subsequently the quality of life. Quality of life in patients with KS has received limited attention, and no studies have been conducted to experimentally examine the effect of EL on quality of life in patients in this patient group. The QUALIDEM, an observation scale for quality of life, was completed by professional nurses before and after EL training in a group of fifty-one patients with KS. This scale was also completed for a group of thirty-one control patients receiving care as usual but no EL training. Quality of life was significantly increased on eight of the nine subscales in the Korsakoff group who participated in an EL training. There was a trend toward a significant increase in "positive affect" (ie, the ninth subscale). In contrast, no changes over time were found on any of the subscales in the control group that did not participate in any EL training. Despite severe memory impairments, patients with KS still have the potential to (partially) (re)learn tasks using EL. This potential should be exploited, as the successes of (re)-learning might improve the quality of life of Korsakoff patients in nursing homes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,208,166
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#914
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,542
of 340,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#16
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,752 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.