| Title |
Current clinical practice: differential management of uveal melanoma in the era of molecular tumor analyses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s70839 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas M Aaberg, Robert W Cook, Kristen Oelschlager, Derek Maetzold, P Kumar Rao, John O Mason |
| Abstract |
Assess current clinical practices for uveal melanoma (UM) and the impact of molecular prognostic testing on treatment decisions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 16% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 3 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 52% |
| Engineering | 4 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2015.
All research outputs
#1,891,860
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#116
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,184
of 369,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#2
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.