↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Current clinical practice: differential management of uveal melanoma in the era of molecular tumor analyses

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 927)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
1 tweeter
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Current clinical practice: differential management of uveal melanoma in the era of molecular tumor analyses
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2014
DOI 10.2147/opth.s70839
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tom Aaberg, Robert Cook, Kristen Oelschlager, Derek Maetzold, P. Kumar Rao, John O. Mason

Abstract

Assess current clinical practices for uveal melanoma (UM) and the impact of molecular prognostic testing on treatment decisions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Postgraduate 4 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Other 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Other 7 27%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Engineering 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 2 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2015.
All research outputs
#215,474
of 4,768,206 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#4
of 927 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,989
of 155,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,768,206 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 927 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.