↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Optimizing iron delivery in the management of anemia: patient considerations and the role of ferric carboxymaltose

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Optimizing iron delivery in the management of anemia: patient considerations and the role of ferric carboxymaltose
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, December 2014
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s55499
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jorge Eduardo Toblli, Margarita Angerosa

Abstract

With the challenge of optimizing iron delivery, new intravenous (iv) iron-carbohydrate complexes have been developed in the last few years. A good example of these new compounds is ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), which has recently been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in adult patients who are intolerant to oral iron or present an unsatisfactory response to oral iron, and in adult patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD). FCM is a robust and stable complex similar to ferritin, which minimizes the release of labile iron during administration, allowing higher doses to be administered in a single application and with a favorable cost-effective rate. Cumulative information from randomized, controlled, multicenter trials on a diverse range of indications, including patients with chronic heart failure, postpartum anemia/abnormal uterine bleeding, inflammatory bowel disease, NDD-CKD, and those undergoing hemodialysis, supports the efficacy of FCM for iron replacement in patients with iron deficiency and iron-deficiency anemia. Furthermore, as FCM is a dextran-free iron-carbohydrate complex (which has a very low risk for hypersensitivity reactions) with a small proportion of the reported adverse effects in a large number of subjects who received FCM, it may be considered a safe drug. Therefore, FCM appears as an interesting option to apply high doses of iron as a single infusion in a few minutes in order to obtain the quick replacement of iron stores. The present review on FCM summarizes diverse aspects such as pharmacology characteristics and analyzes trials on the efficacy/safety of FCM versus oral iron and different iv iron compounds in multiple clinical scenarios. Additionally, the information on cost effectiveness and data on change in quality of life are also discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 165 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 16%
Researcher 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Student > Postgraduate 15 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 36 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 37 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,047,002
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#452
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,554
of 369,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#14
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.