Title |
Inhibition of cancer cell migration with CuS@mSiO<sub>2</sub>-PEG nanoparticles by repressing MMP-2/MMP-9 expression
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2017
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s148487 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Guoying Deng, Feng Zhou, Zizheng Wu, Fei Zhang, Kerun Niu, Yingjie Kang, Xijian Liu, Qiugen Wang, Yin Wang, Qian Wang |
Abstract |
The metastasis of cancer cells is a vital aspect of disease progression and therapy. Although a few nanoparticles (NPs) aimed at controlling metastasis in cancer therapy have been reported, the NPs are normally combined with drugs, yet the direct therapeutic effects of the NPs are not reported. To study the direct influence of NPs on cancer metastasis, the potential suppression capacity of CuS@mSiO2-PEG NPs to tumor cell migration, a kind of typical photothermal NPs, was systemically evaluated in this study. Using CuS@mSiO2-PEG NP stimulation and a transwell migration assay, we found that the migration of HeLa cells was significantly decreased. This phenomenon may be associated with two classical proteins in metastasis: matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP-2) and matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9). In addition, the mechanism may closely associate with non-receptor tyrosine kinase protein (SRC)/focal adhesion kinase (FAK) signaling pathway which varies in vivo and in vitro. To confirm the differences in the expression of SRC and FAK, related inhibitors were studied for additional comparison. Also, the results indicated that even though the migration inhibition was closely related to SRC and FAK signaling pathway, there may be another unknown regulation mechanism existing and its metastasis inhibition was significant. Confirmed by long-term survival curve study, CuS@mSiO2-PEG NPs significantly reduced the metastasis of cancer cells and improved the survival rates of metastasis in a mouse model. Thus, we believe that the direct influence of NPs on cancer cell metastasis is a promising study topic. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 23% |
Student > Master | 3 | 23% |
Researcher | 2 | 15% |
Professor | 1 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
Other | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 23% |
Materials Science | 1 | 8% |
Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
Engineering | 1 | 8% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 46% |