↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Acute effects of single and multiple level thoracic manipulations on chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
Title
Acute effects of single and multiple level thoracic manipulations on chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, January 2015
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s69579
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rungthip Puntumetakul, Thavatchai Suvarnnato, Phurichaya Werasirirat, Sureeporn Uthaikhup, Junichiro Yamauchi, Rose Boucaut

Abstract

Thoracic spine manipulation has become a popular alternative to local cervical manipulative therapy for mechanical neck pain. This study investigated the acute effects of single-level and multiple-level thoracic manipulations on chronic mechanical neck pain (CMNP).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 133 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 23%
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Other 12 9%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 28 20%
Unknown 26 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Physics and Astronomy 3 2%
Other 12 9%
Unknown 30 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,542,654
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#519
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,307
of 359,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#13
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.