Title |
Acute effects of single and multiple level thoracic manipulations on chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/ndt.s69579 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rungthip Puntumetakul, Thavatchai Suvarnnato, Phurichaya Werasirirat, Sureeporn Uthaikhup, Junichiro Yamauchi, Rose Boucaut |
Abstract |
Thoracic spine manipulation has become a popular alternative to local cervical manipulative therapy for mechanical neck pain. This study investigated the acute effects of single-level and multiple-level thoracic manipulations on chronic mechanical neck pain (CMNP). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 33% |
Spain | 1 | 17% |
Italy | 1 | 17% |
Australia | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 133 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 31 | 23% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 13% |
Other | 12 | 9% |
Researcher | 12 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
Other | 28 | 20% |
Unknown | 26 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 2% |
Other | 12 | 9% |
Unknown | 30 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,542,654
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#519
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,307
of 359,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#13
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.