↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Acute effects of single and multiple level thoracic manipulations on chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
facebook
10 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
Title
Acute effects of single and multiple level thoracic manipulations on chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, January 2015
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s69579
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rungthip Puntumetakul, Thavatchai Suvarnnato, Phurichaya Werasirirat, Sureeporn Uthaikhup, Junichiro Yamauchi, Rose Boucaut

Abstract

Thoracic spine manipulation has become a popular alternative to local cervical manipulative therapy for mechanical neck pain. This study investigated the acute effects of single-level and multiple-level thoracic manipulations on chronic mechanical neck pain (CMNP).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 115 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 25%
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Other 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 14 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 3%
Physics and Astronomy 3 3%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 17 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,819,183
of 12,517,383 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#278
of 2,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,678
of 272,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#15
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,517,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.