| Title |
Patients’ knowledge and perspectives on wet age-related macular degeneration and its treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s9969 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sushma Kandula, Jeffrey C Lamkin, Teresa Albanese, Deepak P Edward |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Israel | 1 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 27 | 87% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 19% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#820
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,293
of 103,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.