| Title |
Oral health status, dental treatment needs, and barriers to dental care of elderly care home residents in Lodz, Poland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s69790 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ewelina Gaszynska, Franciszek Szatko, Malgorzata Godala, Tomasz Gaszynski |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Researcher | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 40% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 42 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2019.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#841
of 1,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,451
of 251,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#21
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.