↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Central serous chorioretinopathy: a pathogenetic model

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Central serous chorioretinopathy: a pathogenetic model
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2011
DOI 10.2147/opth.s17182
Pubmed ID
Authors

Antonio Caccavale

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Turkey 1 2%
Unknown 56 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 24%
Student > Master 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 13 22%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 61%
Unspecified 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 13 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2014.
All research outputs
#7,453,350
of 22,786,087 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#687
of 3,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,298
of 182,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#4
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,786,087 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,176 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.