↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Feasibility of a community-based Functional Power Training program for older adults

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
103 Mendeley
Title
Feasibility of a community-based Functional Power Training program for older adults
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, February 2018
DOI 10.2147/cia.s157911
Pubmed ID
Authors

Queenie Lin Ling Tan, Lilian Min Yen Chye, Daniella Hui Min Ng, Mei Sian Chong, Tze Pin Ng, Shiou Liang Wee

Abstract

Community-based programs can increase and sustain physical activity participation in older adults, even for those who are physically frail. We studied the feasibility and potential effect of a 12-week structured Functional Power Training (FPT) program involving high velocities and low loads for older adults conducted in a common area of their housing estate. The structured FPT program was conducted in collaboration with a health promotion social enterprise and a community service provider based in a public housing site. We recruited nine inactive residents as participants to the single, group-based, twice-weekly program. Attendance and adverse event(s) were recorded throughout the program. The Short Physical Performance Battery, Timed Up and Go (TUG), and 30s Sit-to-Stand tests were used to assess functional outcomes pre- and postprogram. The FRAIL Scale was used to assess their frailty status, and a postprogram experience survey was conducted. Eight subjects (aged 74±10 years) completed the program with an average overall attendance of 90.3%, with at least five participants present for each session. Changes in functional outcomes showed a moderate-to-large effect with significant improvement in TUG (p<0.01). In addition, participants either reversed or maintained their frailty status (p<0.01). Overall, the program was perceived to be well structured, engaging, as well as providing physical and psychosocial benefits. No exercise-related adverse events occurred during the program, and participants were keen to recommend this program to others. Community-based structured FPT is safe and feasible for frail older adults, with the potential to improve function and reverse frailty status.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 103 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 33 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 9%
Sports and Recreations 8 8%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 4%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 39 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,000,448
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#653
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,394
of 448,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#14
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.