| Title |
Prospective comparison of two methods of screening for diabetic retinopathy by nonmydriatic fundus camera
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s14521 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pedro Romero-Aroca, Ramon Sagarra-Alamo, Josep Basora-Gallisa, Teresa Basora-Gallisa, Marc Baget-Bernaldiz, Angel Bautista-Perez |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 30% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 55% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#8,543,833
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#822
of 3,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,675
of 190,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,715 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.