↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Prospective comparison of two methods of screening for diabetic retinopathy by nonmydriatic fundus camera

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Prospective comparison of two methods of screening for diabetic retinopathy by nonmydriatic fundus camera
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2010
DOI 10.2147/opth.s14521
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pere Romero-Aroca, Marc Baget-Bernaldiz, Angel Bautista-Perez, Teresa Basora-Gallisa, Josep Basora-Gallisa, Basora-Gallisa

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 61 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Postgraduate 9 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Other 19 29%
Unknown 9 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 41 62%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 9 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#5,610,213
of 17,367,552 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#466
of 2,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,616
of 286,498 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#9
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,367,552 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,501 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,498 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.