↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Prospective comparison of two methods of screening for diabetic retinopathy by nonmydriatic fundus camera

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Prospective comparison of two methods of screening for diabetic retinopathy by nonmydriatic fundus camera
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, December 2010
DOI 10.2147/opth.s14521
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pere Romero-Aroca, Marc Baget-Bernaldiz, Angel Bautista-Perez, Teresa Basora-Gallisa, Josep Basora-Gallisa, Basora-Gallisa

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 4%
Portugal 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 47 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 9 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 14 27%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 69%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 5 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#3,524,254
of 12,287,089 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#249
of 1,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,415
of 270,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,287,089 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,554 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.