↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

COPD: balancing oxidants and antioxidants

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
222 Mendeley
Title
COPD: balancing oxidants and antioxidants
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, February 2015
DOI 10.2147/copd.s42414
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernard M Fischer, Judith A Voynow, Andrew J Ghio

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most common chronic illnesses in the world. The disease encompasses emphysema, chronic bronchitis, and small airway obstruction and can be caused by environmental exposures, primarily cigarette smoking. Since only a small subset of smokers develop COPD, it is believed that host factors interact with the environment to increase the propensity to develop disease. The major pathogenic factors causing disease include infection and inflammation, protease and antiprotease imbalance, and oxidative stress overwhelming antioxidant defenses. In this review, we will discuss the major environmental and host sources for oxidative stress; discuss how oxidative stress regulates chronic bronchitis; review the latest information on genetic predisposition to COPD, specifically focusing on oxidant/antioxidant imbalance; and review future antioxidant therapeutic options for COPD. The complexity of COPD will necessitate a multi-target therapeutic approach. It is likely that antioxidant supplementation and dietary antioxidants will have a place in these future combination therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 222 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 222 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 41 18%
Student > Master 36 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 11%
Researcher 14 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 66 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 6%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 74 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,983,292
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#320
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,501
of 361,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.