↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Insomnia in hospitalized psychiatric patients: prevalence and associated factors

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Insomnia in hospitalized psychiatric patients: prevalence and associated factors
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, April 2018
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s160742
Pubmed ID
Authors

Farid Talih, Jean Ajaltouni, Hiba Ghandour, Ahmad Subhi Abu-Mohammad, Firas Kobeissy

Abstract

To quantify and describe the prevalence of insomnia in hospitalized psychiatric patients and to investigate the associations between insomnia and demographic and clinical factors in hospitalized psychiatric patients. The participants included 203 individuals hospitalized for psychiatric treatment at an academic medical center. Demographic information, psychiatric diagnoses, current psychotropic medication use, and history of substance use were collected. Insomnia screening was performed using the Insomnia Severity Index. Depressive and anxiety symptoms were also evaluated using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder questionnaire and the Patient Health Questionnaire. Restless legs syndrome (RLS) symptoms were evaluated using the Restless Legs Syndrome Rating Scale (RLSRS). Statistical analysis was conducted to detect the prevalence of insomnia among the participants and to examine possible associations among psychiatric disorders, psychotropic medications, and RLS. Out of the 203 participants that completed the survey, 67.4% were found to have insomnia and 14.3% were found to have RLS. The severity of insomnia was found to be associated with the presence of RLS, depressive and anxious symptomatology, suicidal ideation, use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and use of benzodiazepines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 23%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Researcher 4 6%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 21 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 23%
Psychology 7 11%
Neuroscience 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 22 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2018.
All research outputs
#7,092,439
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#883
of 3,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,975
of 344,595 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#20
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,595 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.