↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Current status of parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition application: an assessment of nutritional prescriptions from 59 hospitals in the People’s Republic of China

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Current status of parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition application: an assessment of nutritional prescriptions from 59 hospitals in the People’s Republic of China
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, February 2015
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s76636
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ma Ke, Gang Han, Zhenwei Yu

Abstract

The aim of the study reported here was to assess the use of parenteral nutrition (PN) and enteral nutrition (EN), and the prevalence of PN and EN formulas, in the People's Republic of China.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 25%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 3 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2015.
All research outputs
#9,993,257
of 12,485,238 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#763
of 922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,371
of 217,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,485,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 922 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.