↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Neuroprotective strategies against calpain-mediated neurodegeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Neuroprotective strategies against calpain-mediated neurodegeneration
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, February 2015
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s78226
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aysegul Yildiz-Unal, Sirin Korulu, Arzu Karabay

Abstract

Calpains are calcium-dependent proteolytic enzymes that have deleterious effects on neurons upon their pathological over-activation. According to the results of numerous studies to date, there is no doubt that abnormal calpain activation triggers activation and progression of apoptotic processes in neurodegeneration, leading to neuronal death. Thus, it is very crucial to unravel all the aspects of calpain-mediated neurodegeneration in order to protect neurons through eliminating or at least minimizing its lethal effects. Protecting neurons against calpain-activated apoptosis basically requires developing effective, reliable, and most importantly, therapeutically applicable approaches to succeed. From this aspect, the most significant studies focusing on preventing calpain-mediated neurodegeneration include blocking the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)-type glutamate receptor activities, which are closely related to calpain activation; directly inhibiting calpain itself via intrinsic or synthetic calpain inhibitors, or inhibiting its downstream processes; and utilizing the neuroprotectant steroid hormone estrogen and its receptors. In this review, the most remarkable neuroprotective strategies for calpain-mediated neurodegeneration are categorized and summarized with respect to their advantages and disadvantages over one another, in terms of their efficiency and applicability as a therapeutic regimen in the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 21%
Student > Master 16 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 14%
Neuroscience 12 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 18 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,204,882
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#913
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,292
of 361,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#21
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.