| Title |
Quality of life in adolescent and young adult cancer patients: a systematic review of the literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient related outcome measures, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/prom.s51658 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gwendolyn P Quinn, Vânia Gonçalves, Ivana Sehovic, Meghan L Bowman, Damon R Reed |
| Abstract |
Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors experience many unique challenges and quality of life (QoL) effects that persist beyond cancer diagnosis and treatment. Due to continuous improvements in technology and cancer treatments resulting in improved survival rates, the identification of late effects, survivorship issues, and QoL is moving to the forefront of cancer research. The goal of this systematic review was to identify key psychosocial factors impacting QoL in AYA oncology populations. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 209 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 32 | 15% |
| Researcher | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 40 | 19% |
| Unknown | 67 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 22% |
| Psychology | 37 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 8% |
| Unknown | 74 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2015.
All research outputs
#8,426,350
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Patient related outcome measures
#56
of 196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,677
of 361,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient related outcome measures
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.