↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Link between type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease: from epidemiology to mechanism and treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#38 of 1,968)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
5 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
479 Mendeley
Title
Link between type 2 diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease: from epidemiology to mechanism and treatment
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, March 2015
DOI 10.2147/cia.s74042
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaohua Li, Dalin Song, Sean X Leng

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the epidemiological evidence linking type 2 diabetes mellitus and its related conditions, including obesity, hyperinsulinemia, and metabolic syndrome, to Alzheimer's disease (AD). Several mechanisms could help to explain this proposed link; however, our focus is on insulin resistance and deficiency. Studies have shown that insulin resistance and deficiency can interact with amyloid-β protein and tau protein phosphorylation, each leading to the onset and development of AD. Based on those epidemiological data and basic research, it was recently proposed that AD can be considered as "type 3 diabetes". Special attention has been paid to determining whether antidiabetic agents might be effective in treating AD. There has been much research both experimental and clinical on this topic. We mainly discuss the clinical trials on insulin, metformin, thiazolidinediones, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in the treatment of AD. Although the results of these trials seem to be contradictory, this approach is also full of promise. It is worth mentioning that the therapeutic effects of these drugs are influenced by the apolipoprotein E (APOE)-ε4 genotype. Patients without the APOE-ε4 allele showed better treatment effects than those with this allele.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 479 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Macao 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Unknown 473 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 15%
Student > Master 70 15%
Student > Bachelor 66 14%
Researcher 40 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 5%
Other 62 13%
Unknown 148 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 16%
Neuroscience 51 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 28 6%
Other 63 13%
Unknown 169 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 100. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#420,446
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#38
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,880
of 270,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.