↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Developments in flexible endoscopic surgery: a review

Overview of attention for article published in this source, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Developments in flexible endoscopic surgery: a review
Published by
Dove Press, December 2014
DOI 10.2147/ceg.s46584
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hubertus Feussner, Tim Lueth, Rebekka Schirren, Valentin Becker, Dirk Wilhelm, Michael Kranzfelder, Alexander Meining, Margit Bauer

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 32%
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Master 4 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Unspecified 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 13 46%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 32%
Unspecified 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 December 2014.
All research outputs
#3,982,629
of 4,759,378 outputs
Outputs from this source
#4
of 4 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,020
of 152,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from this source
#52
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,759,378 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.