↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Vulvar cancer: epidemiology, clinical presentation, and management options

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 842)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
Title
Vulvar cancer: epidemiology, clinical presentation, and management options
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, March 2015
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s68979
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ibrahim Alkatout, Melanie Schubert, Nele Garbrecht, Marion Tina Weigel, Walter Jonat, Christoph Mundhenke, Veronika Günther

Abstract

Vulvar cancer can be classified into two groups according to predisposing factors: the first type correlates with a HPV infection and occurs mostly in younger patients. The second group is not HPV associated and occurs often in elderly women without neoplastic epithelial disorders. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most common malignant tumor of the vulva (95%). Pruritus is the most common and long-lasting reported symptom of vulvar cancer, followed by vulvar bleeding, discharge, dysuria, and pain. The gold standard for even a small invasive carcinoma of the vulva was historically radical vulvectomy with removal of the tumor with a wide margin followed by an en bloc resection of the inguinal and often the pelvic lymph nodes. Currently, a more individualized and less radical treatment is suggested: a radical wide local excision is possible in the case of localized lesions (T1). A sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy may be performed to reduce wound complications and lymphedema. The survival of patients with vulvar cancer is good when convenient therapy is arranged quickly after initial diagnosis. Inguinal and/or femoral node involvement is the most significant prognostic factor for survival.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 244 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 18%
Student > Master 27 11%
Student > Postgraduate 25 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 7%
Other 47 19%
Unknown 68 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 76 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2023.
All research outputs
#698,533
of 24,529,782 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#46
of 842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,744
of 261,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,529,782 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.