↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Modeling the budget impact of long-acting injectable paliperidone palmitate in the treatment of schizophrenia in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Modeling the budget impact of long-acting injectable paliperidone palmitate in the treatment of schizophrenia in Japan
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, May 2015
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s85514
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jörg Mahlich, Masamichi Nishi, Yoshimichi Saito

Abstract

The cost of schizophrenia in Japan is high and new long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics might be able to reduce costs by causing a reduction of hospital stays. We aim to estimate budget effects of the introduction of a new 1-month LAI, paliperidone palmitate, in Japan. A budget impact analysis was conducted from a payer perspective. The model took direct costs of illness into account (ie, costs for inpatient and outpatient services, as well as drug costs). The robustness of the model was checked using a sensitivity analysis. According to our calculations, direct total costs of schizophrenia reach 710,500 million yen a year (US$6 billion). These costs decrease to 691,000 million yen (US$5.9 billion) 3 years after the introduction of paliperidone palmitate. From a payer point of view, the introduction of a new treatment for schizophrenia in Japan helps to save resources and is not associated with a higher financial burden.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 21%
Other 5 13%
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 12 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 14 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2015.
All research outputs
#17,348,916
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#331
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,167
of 279,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.