| Title |
Selective axonal growth of embryonic hippocampal neurons according to topographic features of various sizes and shapes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s12376 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Fozdar, S Chen, Christine Schmidt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 36% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 20 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 17% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2017.
All research outputs
#7,557,593
of 23,053,169 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#937
of 3,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,568
of 181,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,053,169 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,841 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.