| Title |
Spray deposition of live cells throughout the electrospinning process produces nanofibrous three-dimensional tissue scaffolds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, May 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s18803 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Webster, Iustin Seil, Bikram Basu, Dhirendra Katti |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 34 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 32% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 16% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 4 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 32% |
| Engineering | 7 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2014.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,077
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,384
of 121,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.