↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Lipidomics in vascular health: current perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Vascular Health and Risk Management, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
Title
Lipidomics in vascular health: current perspectives
Published in
Vascular Health and Risk Management, January 2015
DOI 10.2147/vhrm.s54874
Pubmed ID
Authors

Genovefa Kolovou, Sophie Mavrogeni, Vana Kolovou

Abstract

Identifying the mechanisms that convert a healthy vascular wall to an atherosclerotic wall is of major importance since the consequences may lead to a shortened lifespan. Classical risk factors (age, smoking, obesity, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia) may result in the progression of atherosclerotic lesions by processes including inflammation and lipid accumulation. Thus, the evaluation of blood lipids and the full lipid complement produced by cells, organisms, or tissues (lipidomics) is an issue of importance. In this review, we shall describe the recent progress in vascular health research using lipidomic advances. We will begin with an overview of vascular wall biology and lipids, followed by a short analysis of lipidomics. Finally, we shall focus on the clinical implications of lipidomics and studies that have examined lipidomic approaches and vascular health.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 70 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 22%
Student > Master 12 16%
Other 4 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 15%
Chemistry 8 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 13 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2015.
All research outputs
#2,620,238
of 5,281,486 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#165
of 341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,049
of 179,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,281,486 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 341 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,262 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.