↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

In vivo comparative study of ocular vasodilation, a relative indicator of hyperemia, in guinea pigs following treatment with bimatoprost ophthalmic solutions 0.01% and 0.03%

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
10 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
In vivo comparative study of ocular vasodilation, a relative indicator of hyperemia, in guinea pigs following treatment with bimatoprost ophthalmic solutions 0.01% and 0.03%
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2010
DOI 10.2147/opth.s10444
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abayomi Ogundele

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 43%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 29%
Other 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 71%
Unknown 2 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#3,442,183
of 12,072,146 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#243
of 1,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,794
of 256,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,072,146 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,508 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,682 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.