| Title |
Cost utility analysis of immunosuppressive regimens in adult renal transplant recipients in England and Wales
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, November 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s69461 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gorden Muduma, Jane Shaw, Warren M Hart, Abayomi Odeyemi, Isaac Odeyemi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 28% |
| Psychology | 6 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2015.
All research outputs
#8,626,132
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#639
of 1,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,116
of 274,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#6
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.