↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) sedation: clinical utility of fospropofol

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) sedation: clinical utility of fospropofol
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, December 2009
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s5583
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Lubarsky, Eric A Harris, Keith A Candiotti

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
India 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 23 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 15%
Lecturer 4 15%
Professor 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,447,868
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#408
of 1,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,305
of 165,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,263 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.