↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive–compulsive disorder: access to treatment, prediction of long-term outcome with neuroimaging

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive–compulsive disorder: access to treatment, prediction of long-term outcome with neuroimaging
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, July 2015
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s75106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph O'Neill, Jamie Feusner

Abstract

This article reviews issues related to a major challenge to the field for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): improving access to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). Patient-related barriers to access include the stigma of OCD and reluctance to take on the demands of CBT. Patient-external factors include the shortage of trained CBT therapists and the high costs of CBT. The second half of the review focuses on one partial, yet plausible aid to improve access - prediction of long-term response to CBT, particularly using neuroimaging methods. Recent pilot data are presented revealing a potential for pretreatment resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the brain to forecast OCD symptom severity up to 1 year after completing CBT.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 71 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 22%
Student > Bachelor 13 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 15%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 42%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 11%
Neuroscience 7 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 11 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2015.
All research outputs
#2,673,604
of 5,387,274 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#75
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,454
of 189,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#9
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,387,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.