| Title |
Clinical utility of eslicarbazepine: current evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/dddt.s57409 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gaetano Zaccara, Fabio Giovannelli, Massimo Cincotta, Alessia Carelli, Alberto Verrotti |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 26% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 7% |
| Psychology | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#641
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,028
of 361,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#18
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.