↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Evaluation of a partial retinal surface tear by optical coherence tomography

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of a partial retinal surface tear by optical coherence tomography
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, June 2011
DOI 10.2147/opth.s21873
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hisato Ohno, Kenji Kawazoe, Kenji Inoue

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Other 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2021.
All research outputs
#6,233,912
of 19,195,752 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#513
of 2,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,609
of 292,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,195,752 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,780 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.