↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of cocaine addiction: evidence to date

Overview of attention for article published in Substance abuse and rehabilitation, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 103)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of cocaine addiction: evidence to date
Published in
Substance abuse and rehabilitation, May 2018
DOI 10.2147/sar.s161206
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corinna Bolloni, Paola Badas, Giorgio Corona, Marco Diana

Abstract

There is a common consensus in considering substance-use disorders (SUDs) a devastating chronic illness with social and psychological impact. Despite significant progress in understanding the neurobiology of SUDs, therapeutic advances have proceeded at a slower pace, in particular for cocaine-use disorder (CUD). Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is gaining support as a safe and cost-effective tool in the treatment of SUDs. In this review, we consider human studies that have investigated the efficacy of TMS in achieving therapeutic benefits in treating CUD. All studies conducted to date that have evaluated the therapeutic effect of TMS in CUD are included. We focus on the protocol of stimulation applied, emphasizing the neurophysiological effects of coils employed related to outcomes. Moreover, we examine the subjective and objective measurements used to assess the therapeutic effects along the timeline considered. The revision of scientific literatures underscores the therapeutic potential of TMS in treating CUD. However, the variability in stimulation protocols applied and the lack of methodological control do not allow us to draw firm conclusions, and further studies are warranted to examine the interaction between TMS patterns of stimulation relative to clinical outcomes in depth.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Master 7 14%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 15 29%
Psychology 14 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 10 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2019.
All research outputs
#765,585
of 14,684,909 outputs
Outputs from Substance abuse and rehabilitation
#14
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,059
of 275,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Substance abuse and rehabilitation
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,684,909 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them