↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Adherence ability of Staphylococcus epidermidis on prosthetic biomaterials: an in vitro study [Corrigendum]

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Adherence ability of Staphylococcus epidermidis on prosthetic biomaterials: an in vitro study [Corrigendum]
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s92876
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hironobu Koseki, Takayuki Shida, Itaru Yoda, Hidehiko Horiuchi, Hideyuki Sakoda, Makoto Osaki

Abstract

[This corrects the article on p. 3955 in vol. 8, PMID: 24143100.].

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,720,353
of 5,476,876 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#531
of 1,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,734
of 191,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#68
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,476,876 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,455 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.