↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems [Corrigendum]

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
Title
Comparison of cumulative dissipated energy between the Infiniti and Centurion phacoemulsification systems [Corrigendum]
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/opth.s93330
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ming Chen, Erik Anderson, Geoffrey Hill, John J Chen, Thomas Patrianakos

Abstract

[This corrects the article on p. 1367 in vol. 9, PMID: 26229430.].

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2015.
All research outputs
#9,995,740
of 12,488,808 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,037
of 1,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,910
of 238,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#71
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,488,808 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.