↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Misophonia: current perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
11 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
Title
Misophonia: current perspectives
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s81438
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea E Cavanna, Stefano Seri

Abstract

Misophonia is characterized by a negative reaction to a sound with a specific pattern and meaning to a given individual. In this paper, we review the clinical features of this relatively common yet underinvestigated condition, with focus on co-occurring neurodevelopmental disorders. Currently available data on the putative pathophysiology of the condition can inform our understanding and guide the diagnostic process and treatment approach. Tinnitus retraining therapy and cognitive behavior therapy have been proposed as the most effective treatment strategies for reducing symptoms; however, current treatment algorithms should be validated in large population studies. At the present stage, competing paradigms see misophonia as a physiological state potentially inducible in any subject, an idiopathic condition (which can present with comorbid psychiatric disorders), or a symptomatic manifestation of an underlying psychiatric disorder. Agreement on the use of standardized diagnostic criteria would be an important step forward in terms of both clinical practice and scientific inquiry. Areas for future research include phenomenology, epidemiology, modulating factors, neurophysiological underpinnings, and treatment trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 200 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 35 17%
Researcher 25 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Student > Master 24 12%
Other 12 6%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 60 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 6%
Neuroscience 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 59 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#437,333
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#53
of 3,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,857
of 276,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.