↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Misophonia: current perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 2,635)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 tweeters
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
3 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
Misophonia: current perspectives
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s81438
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrea Eugenio Cavanna, Stefano Seri

Abstract

Misophonia is characterized by a negative reaction to a sound with a specific pattern and meaning to a given individual. In this paper, we review the clinical features of this relatively common yet underinvestigated condition, with focus on co-occurring neurodevelopmental disorders. Currently available data on the putative pathophysiology of the condition can inform our understanding and guide the diagnostic process and treatment approach. Tinnitus retraining therapy and cognitive behavior therapy have been proposed as the most effective treatment strategies for reducing symptoms; however, current treatment algorithms should be validated in large population studies. At the present stage, competing paradigms see misophonia as a physiological state potentially inducible in any subject, an idiopathic condition (which can present with comorbid psychiatric disorders), or a symptomatic manifestation of an underlying psychiatric disorder. Agreement on the use of standardized diagnostic criteria would be an important step forward in terms of both clinical practice and scientific inquiry. Areas for future research include phenomenology, epidemiology, modulating factors, neurophysiological underpinnings, and treatment trials.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 132 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 19%
Researcher 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 14%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 21 16%
Unknown 19 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 48 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 23 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 71. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2020.
All research outputs
#347,280
of 16,983,585 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#34
of 2,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,103
of 243,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#3
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,983,585 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.