↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A review of mobile applications to help adolescent and young adult cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
A review of mobile applications to help adolescent and young adult cancer patients
Published in
Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/ahmt.s69209
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kimberly M Wesley, Philip J Fizur

Abstract

To review research articles utilizing mobile applications with adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients. We identified articles via online searches and reference lists (eg, PsycInfo, PubMed). Articles were reviewed by two study team members for target population, stated purpose, technological utilization, sample size, demographic characteristics, and outcome data. Strengths and weaknesses of each study were described. Of 19 identified manuscripts, six met full inclusion criteria for this review (four smartphone applications and two tablet applications). One additional article that included an application not specific to oncology but included AYA patients with cancer within the target sample was also reviewed. Uses of these applications included symptom tracking, pain management, monitoring of eating habits following bone marrow transplant, monitoring of mucositis, and improving medication management. Utility results from pilot studies are presented. Mobile applications are growing in number and increasingly available to AYAs with and without chronic illness. These applications may prove useful in helping to support AYAs throughout their cancer treatment and beyond. However, few applications provide empirical data supporting their utility. Numerous strengths and benefits of these applications include increased accessibility to educational resources and self-management strategies, more frequent physical and emotional symptom tracking, and increased access to peer support. Despite these strengths, numerous limitations are identified, highlighting the need for future research in this area.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 157 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 45 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 13%
Computer Science 14 9%
Psychology 11 7%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 51 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,799,182
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#101
of 151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,468
of 276,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.