Title |
The LIFE Cognition Study: design and baseline characteristics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, August 2014
|
DOI | 10.2147/cia.s65381 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kaycee M Sink, Mark A Espeland, Julia Rushing, Cynthia M Castro, Timothy S Church, Ronald Cohen, Thomas M Gill, Leora Henkin, Janine M Jennings, Diana R Kerwin, Todd M Manini, Valerie Myers, Marco Pahor, Kieran F Reid, Nancy Woolard, Stephen R Rapp, Jeff D Williamson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 302 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 298 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 42 | 14% |
Researcher | 29 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 28 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 7% |
Other | 64 | 21% |
Unknown | 95 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 15% |
Psychology | 32 | 11% |
Neuroscience | 16 | 5% |
Sports and Recreations | 15 | 5% |
Other | 40 | 13% |
Unknown | 106 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2015.
All research outputs
#4,835,465
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#493
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,276
of 240,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#11
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.