↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Thyroid function tests before prescribing anti-dementia drugs: a retrospective observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
49 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Thyroid function tests before prescribing anti-dementia drugs: a retrospective observational study
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, July 2018
DOI 10.2147/cia.s168182
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nobuo Sakata, Yasuyuki Okumura

Abstract

Treatable causes of cognitive dysfunction, such as hypothyroidism, should be excluded by physicians before prescribing anti-dementia drugs. Many clinical guidelines for dementia recommend a thyroid function test (TFT) as one of the standard screening tests for cognitive dysfunction. This study aimed to investigate the national implementation rate of TFTs during the 365 days before the initiation of anti-dementia drugs. In this retrospective observational study, using Japan's nationwide claim database, we enrolled ≥65-year-old patients who were newly prescribed anti-dementia drugs between April 2015 and March 2016. The outcome of this study was the implementation of TFTs in the 365 days prior to the index date. We used demographic data, including age, sex, comorbidities, home-based/institutional care, and provider type, as covariates. We identified 262,279 patients newly prescribed anti-dementia drugs; of these, only 32.6% underwent TFTs before the initiation of anti-dementia drug treatment. Patients treated in dementia care centers were twice as likely to undergo TFTs as those treated in clinics (57% vs 26%; adjusted risk ratio: 2.17; 95% confidence interval: 2.01-2.33). In Japan, patients with dementia often do not undergo TFTs before being prescribed anti-dementia drugs, particularly in a primary care setting. This suggests that the practice of screening treatable cognitive dysfunction should be audited.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 19 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Psychology 5 10%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 23 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,120,758
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#103
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,928
of 341,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.