| Title |
Association between insomnia and coping style in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ndt.s168934 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kazutaka Yoshida, Hideyuki Otaka, Hiroshi Murakami, Hirofumi Nakayama, Masaya Murabayashi, Satoru Mizushiri, Koki Matsumura, Jutaro Tanabe, Yuki Matsuhashi, Miyuki Yanagimachi, Norio Sugawara, Kazuhiko Nakamura, Makoto Daimon, Norio Yasui-Furukori |
| Abstract |
Insomnia, which is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), results in a low quality of life, and several relationships exist between insomnia and coping style. Thus, we clarified the association between some coping styles and insomnia among Japanese type 2 DM patients. The subjects included 503 type 2 DM patients (mean age 63.9±12.5 years). Sleep disturbance and personality traits were evaluated using the Japanese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the Brief Scale for Coping Profile, respectively. Lifestyle factors, glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels, and the depression statuses of the patients were also included in the analyses. Among the 503 subjects with type 2 DM, 141 (28.0%) subjects exhibited probable insomnia. After adjusting for confounders, being female, living alone, and using "avoidance and suppression" were significantly correlated with current insomnia. No other relationships were found between insomnia and HbA1c or lifestyle factors, such as smoking, drinking alcohol, and exercise frequency. The prevalence of insomnia in individuals with type 2 DM was high, and the protective factors included some emotion-focused coping styles. Future prospective studies are required to confirm the therapeutic effects of behavioral interventions on insomnia in patients with type 2 DM. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| Colombia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 25 | 32% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 25 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Psychology | 6 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,118,925
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#882
of 3,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,102
of 342,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#22
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.