↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Frequently asked questions in hypoxia research

Overview of attention for article published in Hypoxia, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
279 Mendeley
Title
Frequently asked questions in hypoxia research
Published in
Hypoxia, September 2015
DOI 10.2147/hp.s92198
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roland Wenger, Carsten Scholz, David Hoogewijs, Vartan Kurtcuoglu, Hugo Marti, Roland H Wenger, Carsten C Scholz, Hugo H Marti

Abstract

"What is the O2 concentration in a normoxic cell culture incubator?" This and other frequently asked questions in hypoxia research will be answered in this review. Our intention is to give a simple introduction to the physics of gases that would be helpful for newcomers to the field of hypoxia research. We will provide background knowledge about questions often asked, but without straightforward answers. What is O2 concentration, and what is O2 partial pressure? What is normoxia, and what is hypoxia? How much O2 is experienced by a cell residing in a culture dish in vitro vs in a tissue in vivo? By the way, the O2 concentration in a normoxic incubator is 18.6%, rather than 20.9% or 20%, as commonly stated in research publications. And this is strictly only valid for incubators at sea level.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 279 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 277 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 71 25%
Student > Master 40 14%
Student > Bachelor 38 14%
Researcher 37 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 10%
Other 31 11%
Unknown 35 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 75 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 13%
Engineering 30 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 4%
Other 32 11%
Unknown 46 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,294,522
of 14,498,614 outputs
Outputs from Hypoxia
#9
of 44 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,882
of 249,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hypoxia
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,498,614 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 44 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 35 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.