↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Rapid and quantitative detection of C-reactive protein based on quantum dots and immunofiltration assay

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Rapid and quantitative detection of C-reactive protein based on quantum dots and immunofiltration assay
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, September 2015
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s89307
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pengfei Zhang, Yan Bao, Mohamed Shehata Draz, Huiqi Lu, Chang Liu, Huanxing Han

Abstract

Convenient and rapid immunofiltration assays (IFAs) enable on-site "yes" or "no" determination of disease markers. However, traditional IFAs are commonly qualitative or semi-quantitative and are very limited for the efficient testing of samples in field diagnostics. Here, we overcome these limitations by developing a quantum dots (QDs)-based fluorescent IFA for the quantitative detection of C-reactive proteins (CRP). CRP, the well-known diagnostic marker for acute viral and bacterial infections, was used as a model analyte to demonstrate performance and sensitivity of our developed QDs-based IFA. QDs capped with both polyethylene glycol (PEG) and glutathione were used as fluorescent labels for our IFAs. The presence of the surface PEG layer, which reduced the non-specific protein interactions, in conjunction with the inherent optical properties of QDs, resulted in lower background signal, increased sensitivity, and ability to detect CRP down to 0.79 mg/L with only 5 µL serum sample. In addition, the developed assay is simple, fast and can quantitatively detect CRP with a detection limit up to 200 mg/L. Clinical test results of our QD-based IFA are well correlated with the traditional latex enhance immune-agglutination aggregation. The proposed QD-based fluorescent IFA is very promising, and potentially will be adopted for multiplexed immunoassay and in field point-of-care test.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 22 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 11 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 12%
Engineering 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 25 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,664
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,201
of 276,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#50
of 154 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 154 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.