Title |
Aztreonam (for inhalation solution) for the treatment of chronic lung infections in patients with cystic fibrosis: an evidence-based review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Core Evidence, August 2011
|
DOI | 10.2147/ce.s11181 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stephen Kirkby, Kimberly Novak, Karen McCoy |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 25% |
Researcher | 11 | 20% |
Student > Master | 9 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 38% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 13% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 13% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 18% |
Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Core Evidence
#37
of 77 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,667
of 130,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Core Evidence
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.