↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

The potential of medical device industry in technological and economical context

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
The potential of medical device industry in technological and economical context
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, October 2015
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s88574
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kamil Kuca, Petra Maresova, Marek Penhaker, Ali Selamat

Abstract

The high quality of public health improves not only healthy life expectancy, but also the productivity of labor. The most important part of the health care sector is the medical technology industry. The aim of this study is to analyze the current situation in the medical device industry in Europe, its potential strengths and weaknesses in the context of topical economic and demographic development. The contribution specifies an analysis of the economic state of the medical device industry in the context of demographic development of European Union's macroeconomic indicators and views of experts in the field of medical device development, concerning the opportunities for entities involved in the medical device market. There is fierce competition on the European market. The innovative activity is stable and well regulated by responsible authorities. Worldwide, the medical device market is expected to grow.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 128 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 23%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Researcher 7 5%
Student > Postgraduate 7 5%
Other 14 11%
Unknown 42 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 20 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 23 18%
Unknown 51 40%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2020.
All research outputs
#6,153,910
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#307
of 1,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#74,311
of 274,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#13
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.