| Title |
Comparing resident cataract surgery outcomes under novice versus experienced attending supervision
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s85769 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sidharth Puri, Amanda E Kiely, Jiangxia Wang, Alonzo S Woodfield, Saras Ramanathan, Shameema Sikder |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 26% |
| Unknown | 10 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 60% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2015.
All research outputs
#23,391,126
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#3,264
of 3,792 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,638
of 280,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#84
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,792 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.