↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Electroencephalography signatures of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: clinical utility

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
Title
Electroencephalography signatures of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: clinical utility
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, October 2015
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s51783
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guzmán Alba, Ernesto Pereda, Soledad Mañas, Leopoldo D Méndez, Almudena González, Julián J González

Abstract

The techniques and the most important results on the use of electroencephalography (EEG) to extract different measures are reviewed in this work, which can be clinically useful to study subjects with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). First, we discuss briefly and in simple terms the EEG analysis and processing techniques most used in the context of ADHD. We review techniques that both analyze individual EEG channels (univariate measures) and study the statistical interdependence between different EEG channels (multivariate measures), the so-called functional brain connectivity. Among the former ones, we review the classical indices of absolute and relative spectral power and estimations of the complexity of the channels, such as the approximate entropy and the Lempel-Ziv complexity. Among the latter ones, we focus on the magnitude square coherence and on different measures based on the concept of generalized synchronization and its estimation in the state space. Second, from a historical point of view, we present the most important results achieved with these techniques and their clinical utility (sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy) to diagnose ADHD. Finally, we propose future research lines based on these results.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 15 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 22 26%
Neuroscience 15 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 11%
Engineering 6 7%
Computer Science 4 5%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 23 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2016.
All research outputs
#15,739,010
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,506
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,353
of 286,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#50
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.