↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Caregiver burden, productivity loss, and indirect costs associated with caring for patients with poststroke spasticity

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
Title
Caregiver burden, productivity loss, and indirect costs associated with caring for patients with poststroke spasticity
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, November 2015
DOI 10.2147/cia.s91123
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vaidyanathan Ganapathy, Glenn D Graham, Marco D DiBonaventura, Patrick J Gillard, Amir Goren, Richard D Zorowitz

Abstract

Many stroke survivors experience poststroke spasticity and the related inability to perform basic activities, which necessitates patient management and treatment, and exerts a considerable burden on the informal caregiver. The current study aims to estimate burden, productivity loss, and indirect costs for caregivers of stroke survivors with spasticity. Internet survey data were collected from 153 caregivers of stroke survivors with spasticity including caregiving time and difficulty (Oberst Caregiver Burden Scale), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment measures, and caregiver and patient characteristics. Fractional logit models examined predictors of work-related restriction, and work losses were monetized (2012 median US wages). Mean Oberst Caregiver Burden Scale time and difficulty scores were 46.1 and 32.4, respectively. Employed caregivers (n=71) had overall work restriction (32%), absenteeism (9%), and presenteeism (27%). Caregiver characteristics, lack of nursing home coverage, and stroke survivors' disability predicted all work restriction outcomes. The mean total lost-productivity cost per employed caregiver was US$835 per month (>$10,000 per year; 72% attributable to presenteeism). These findings demonstrate the substantial burden of caring for stroke survivors with spasticity illustrating the societal and economic impact of stroke that extends beyond the stroke survivor.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 224 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 17%
Researcher 30 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 32 14%
Unknown 70 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 49 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 19%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 5%
Psychology 9 4%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Other 27 12%
Unknown 78 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2015.
All research outputs
#15,739,010
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,051
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,771
of 294,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#27
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.